Skip to content
Sunday, October 11, 2026
UrbanBrief

Will Additional Nations Pursue Australia's in Restricting Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward similar measures.

  • Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy may be formalized soon.
  • Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
  • The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
  • In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to approve a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level amid national gridlock.

  • The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
  • Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

  • The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
  • Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.

By

Tiffany Peterson

Maya is a journalist and urban planner passionate about documenting city life and sustainable development.

UrbanBrief

Type to search articles.